Many challenges in software testing arise from the use of inappropriate or inadequate tools. Companies that rely on third-party tools often overlook the hidden problems associated with them. These companies mistakenly believe that using these tools will expedite the software testing process. However, it is important to note that manual testing and full-code automation are considered to be the most effective approaches for software testing. Manual testing, although time-consuming, can provide comprehensive results.In the industry, there are various tools available for software testing that employ methods such as recording and replay, click and play, drag-and-drop, and codeless testing. However, these methods do not encompass all types of software testing and often encounter numerous issues. Some tools only support UI testing, while others are designed for API testing or load testing. Each tool tends to have its own set of problems and limitations.When companies option to purchase multiple tools to cater to different testing requirements, they often face additional challenges and end up wasting both time and money. Managing and troubleshooting multiple tools simultaneously can be complex and inefficient, resulting in an overall negative impact on the testing process.It is important for companies to carefully evaluate their testing needs and select appropriate tools that align with their specific requirements. Striking a balance between manual testing and automation, along with choosing the right tools, can help optimize the software testing process and improve efficiency.
Manual Testing Challenges
Human programmers cannot write the code faster than computers.
Human programmers make mistakes in coding, but TESTENIUM generates 100% accurate code faster.
User needs to install software and testing tools for manual coding, but no tools necessary with TESTENIUM and it generates code.
User needs powerful computers to execute test projects, TESTENIUM executes on scalable cloud server.
Creating projects, adding dependencies and writing code is time consuming, hence expensive, but TESTENIUM does all these automatically.
Automation Testing Challenges
Lack of Customization: Automation is processed in the background, leaving little to no opportunity for testers to modify the scripts.
Not Really Codeless: Although scripts are created and structured automatically, instances can (and likely, will) arise that will require some manual coding. But it is impossible to modify the code as it is hidden. “Codeless” - This is misleading.
Maintainability is Challenging: If tests weren’t designed to be reusable or modular, issues could arise in maintainability as the number of tests is continuously growing, and the application is continually changing.
Interoperability Issues: No codeless test automation solution is universal, with either platform dependency or interoperability issues between multiple browsers and software support, leading to unexpected outcomes.
Bugs & Glitches: Although computer-generated, it is not infallible and improper coverage can lead to bugs and glitches in the script. If that script is reusable and modular, that could lead to the recorded script playing back incorrectly or invalid test results.
The Problems with Record-and-Play
A link will not fail even if you click a wrong Link-Text: In TESTENIUM you will provide all the expected keyword-text for links, so that the test will fail if there is no expected keyword.
Record and playback tests break often: but TESTENIUM execution never breaks, because it generates 100% accurate code and runs on cloud for scalability.
Often duplicate lines of code: but TESTENIUM generates unique code.
Harder to debug failing scripts: but no need of debugging in TESTENIUM as it generates 100% accurate code.
Files created are extremely large, they execute slowly: but TESTENIUM creates generic modules and is shared by other classes.
User needs to spend extra time to navigate through the applications to record: No need of recording in TESTENIUM
Manual Testing Challenges
Human programmers cannot write the code faster than computers.
Human programmers make mistakes in coding, but TESTENIUM generates 100% accurate code faster.
User needs to install software and testing tools for manual coding, but no tools necessary with TESTENIUM and it generates code.
User needs powerful computers to execute test projects, TESTENIUM executes on scalable cloud server.
Creating projects, adding dependencies and writing code is time consuming, hence expensive, but TESTENIUM does all these automatically.
Experience the Difference, Join the Future of Innovation!Testenium empowers businesses to achieve more, faster, and with complete confidence.
Subscribe to our newsletter to get tips, technical guides, and best practices. Once a month. Right in your inbox.